Blog Posts

Science of Reading and Structured Literacy: What Do They Actually Mean?

By Jodi Esposito

If you've been anywhere near a classroom, a family Facebook group, or the education news lately, you've probably run into these terms. They can feel like jargon, and it's easy to wonder if they're just the latest education buzzwords. They're not. Understanding what they mean can help you feel more confident about how your child is learning to read, and why. 

What Is the Science of Reading? 

The Science of Reading is the large body of research, built over decades and across fields like cognitive psychology, linguistics, and education, that explains how children actually learn to read. It's not a single program, curriculum, or company. It's the evidence base that tells us which teaching methods work best and why. 

This research shows that reading is not a skill children pick up naturally the way they learn to talk. Most children need to be explicitly taught how written letters connect to spoken sounds, how to blend those sounds into words, and how to build the vocabulary and background knowledge that let them understand what they're reading. 

What Is Structured Literacy? 

Structured literacy is the teaching approach that puts the Science of Reading into practice in the classroom. It's an instructional method built on explicit, systematic, and cumulative teaching of skills like phonics, phonemic awareness, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension. 

In a structured literacy classroom, skills are taught in a clear sequence, with each new lesson building on what came before. Teachers don't assume children will absorb reading rules by osmosis. Instead, they teach the rules directly, model them, and give children lots of practice applying them. This approach has been shown to help all children, including those with dyslexia and other learning differences, build strong reading skills. 

Why Did Educators Debate How to Teach Reading? 

For decades, educators were split between two very different philosophies. One camp believed the priority should be explicitly teaching reading skills, especially phonics: the relationship between letters and sounds. The other camp believed children learned best through exposure to rich books, meaningful reading experiences, and lots of opportunities to read and write on their own, with phonics playing a smaller, more incidental role. 

This disagreement, sometimes called the "reading wars," shaped textbooks, teacher training programs, and classroom instruction for generations. Families whose children struggled to read often found themselves caught in the middle, unsure which approach their child's school was even using. 

What Does the Research Actually Say? 

The research says it's not either-or. It's both. Decades of studies now show that children need explicit instruction in the skills of reading, like phonics and decoding, and they need rich, engaging books, meaningful conversations about what they read, and joyful reading experiences that make them want to keep going. 

Skills instruction without engagement can leave children able to sound out words but uninterested in reading them. Rich reading experiences without explicit skills instruction can leave children who love being read to but who struggle to decode text on their own. Children need both halves of the equation to become strong, motivated readers. 

What Does This Mean for My Child? 

It means your child's reading instruction should include both explicit skills teaching and plenty of real books and real conversations about them. At school, that might look like a phonics lesson followed by time spent reading and discussing a story together. At home, families can support this same balance by practicing sounds and words while also reading together purely for enjoyment, with no drills attached. 

If you're not sure which approach your child's school uses, it's worth asking. Understanding the answer can help you support what's happening in the classroom at home and can help you advocate for your child if something isn't working. 

Does This Approach Help Reluctant Readers? 

Yes. Explicit, systematic instruction gives reluctant readers a clear and predictable path to build the skills they're missing, rather than leaving them to guess at patterns other children pick up more easily. Pairing that instruction with engaging books and read-aloud time also protects a struggling reader's motivation, which matters just as much as the skills themselves. A child who feels behind but still loves stories is far more likely to keep working at reading than one who has lost interest along the way. 

How Does RIF Support Both Skills and a Love of Reading? 

Reading Is Fundamental supports both sides of this equation because we know children need both to succeed. Through programs like Books for Ownership, we put real, engaging books directly into children's hands, building the kind of reading experiences that spark motivation and joy. Through resources like Skybrary, our digital reading platform, families and educators can access read-aloud videos, activities, and tools that support foundational skills alongside a genuine love of stories. 

Our goal isn't just to help children learn to read. It's to help them love to read, too. When children have both the skills to decode words and the desire to keep turning pages, they become readers for life.